This article explores the potential of generative artificial intelligence (AI) as a mediator in conflict resolution, highlighting both its promising applications and the ethical concerns surrounding its use. Recent research has shown that large language models (LLMs) can significantly boost productive exchanges, reduce incivility, and encourage difficult conversations across social divides. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) demonstrated the effectiveness of AI-generated suggestions in improving online conversations. However, the use of AI in conflict situations raises ethical questions, including concerns about privacy, manipulation, and bias. The article highlights the advantages of AI mediation, including accessibility, consistency, and scalability, while also acknowledging the disadvantages, such as the risk of manipulation and the complexity of human emotions. The key challenges and controversies surrounding the use of AI in conflict resolution are also discussed, including data bias, manipulation risk, and dependence on human autonomy. Ultimately, the article emphasizes the need for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to work together to establish guidelines for the responsible development and deployment of AI in conflict arbitration and prevention contexts.

AI Mediators – The Double-Edged Sword of Conflict Resolution
Generative AI can provide universally accessible conflict mediation strategies, which can be especially beneficial in regions with limited access to professional arbitration resources.
1–2 minutes










