The recent concurring opinion of Eleventh Circuit Judge Kevin Newsom highlights the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) in resolving definitional debates in insurance coverage lawsuits. In the case of Snell v. United Specialty Insurance Company, Judge Newsom suggests that LLMs like OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, and Anthropic’s Claude could help discern the ordinary meaning of undefined words in legal instruments, including insurance policies. The use of LLMs could provide a more transparent and accessible way of interpreting policy language, but also raises concerns about their potential biases and limitations. This approach could have significant implications for the insurance industry, particularly in defining and insuring AI risks.
AI Judges – Can Large Language Models Resolve Insurance Coverage Disputes?
Judge Newsom suggests that AI could be another tool in the judiciary’s toolbox, alongside dictionaries and semantic canons.
1–2 minutes
TOP STORIES
Quantum computing is transforming industries, but it poses significant cybersecurity risks …
A coalition of state attorneys general has opened an investigation into OpenAI …
The U.S. government’s export control directive has forced Anthropic to disable its new AI models, raising questions about regulation and …
SpaceX’s recent deal with Google highlights its shift from aerospace to AI infrastructure …
Google is suing to dismantle the infrastructure behind an alleged massive AI-powered cybercrime operation …
AI usage continues to grow rapidly, even as public sentiment remains skeptical …
