In the wake of Scale AI founder Alexandr Wang’s post about moving away from DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) to instead embrace “MEI” (merit, excellence, and intelligence), the tech industry is again divided on the role of DEI in hiring practices. While Wang and his supporters see meritocracy as the ultimate benchmark for finding qualified candidates, critics argue that this approach is misguided and ignores the structural reasons why some groups are more likely to outperform others. The data suggests that diverse teams are more effective, yet Silicon Valley continues to cling to the idea of meritocracy, despite its subjective nature. Experts point out that a meritocratic system perpetuates existing inequalities by favoring those who already have advantages, and that a more nuanced approach is needed to ensure fairness and inclusivity. In reality, the industry’s focus on meritocracy is a paradox, as it claims to promote fairness while ignoring the systemic barriers faced by underrepresented groups.

Silicon Valley’s Meritocracy Myth
We all want the best people for the job, and there is data to prove that diverse teams are more effective.
1–2 minutes










