Microsoft’s AI chief, Mustafa Suleyman, recently stirred controversy by suggesting that content on the open web should be considered “freeware,” implying that it can be freely used, copied, and reproduced. This perspective, shared during an interview with CNBC, stands in stark contrast to Microsoft’s stringent licensing policies for its own software, such as Windows and Office, which explicitly prohibit unauthorized copying and redistribution. Suleyman argues that the “social contract” of content on the internet has always been one of fair use, a notion that is fundamentally at odds with existing copyright law. U.S. copyright law protects all original works of authorship, including those posted online, and does not distinguish between types of content when it comes to legal protections. This discrepancy highlights the ongoing legal and ethical debates surrounding the use of online content for training AI models. Notably, several lawsuits, including one from The New York Times against OpenAI and Microsoft, challenge the legality of scraping web data for AI development. These legal battles may soon clarify whether the broad interpretation of “fair use” espoused by Suleyman holds any water. Until then, it’s advisable to adhere to existing copyright laws to avoid potential legal repercussions.

Microsoft AI Chief Says Online Content Should Be Seen as Freeware
Microsoft’s AI chief claims web content is freeware, sparking legal debates.
1–2 minutes










